Introduction to Cable News Twitter Ratings

All cable news shows (with a couple of odd-ball exceptions) engage with their audience on Twitter, either through official Twitter accounts, official hashtags, or the Twitter account of their hosts.  The Cable News Twitter Ratings measure the number of tweets that mention a show.  Because many shows are repeated in the overnight hours, there are two metrics. The first, “Tweets During”, counts the number of Tweets during the the particular showing that mention each show. The second, “Tweets Day”, measure the number of tweets that mention show during the calendar day (eastern time).

While Nielsen et al have the luxury accounting for the local time zone of each viewer, Twitter does not provide timezone information for each tweet and so we have no way of knowing the time zone for the sender.  When a show repeats, I sometimes list the repeat showing.  I will work, over time, to try to better handle these issues.  For now, though, the total number of tweets during a day is probably a better metric of a show’s popularity.

In some cases, however, it’s hard to distinguish between tweets that are in response to a show and those in response to some non-show activity of the host(s).  Sean Hannity has more hours on the radio than on TV, and so his daily mention counts are undoubtedly higher than they would be if he just had a TV show.  There is no decent way to account for this, unfortunately.

Here’s an example of a set of ratings:

Ratings for Weekdays 8pm

Network Show Tweets Hour Tweets Day % Male % Female
CNN Anderson Cooper 360 425 1745 48% 52%
Fox News The O’Reilly Factor 20 263 60% 40%
HLN Nancy Grace 115 416 33% 67%
MSNBC All In w/Chris Hayes 1109 2938 49% 51%

For each show, I give time of the showing (in eastern time), the network, the name of the show, and the above mentioned Tweets During and Tweets for the Day.  I also estimate the percentage of senders who are male or female.  Be aware, though, that these estimates are going to be very imprecise.  For a full explanation, see this page.

For each show, I filter the tweets based upon my best observation of what people use to talk to and about the show on Twitter.  When a show has one or two personalities who are strongly identified with it (almost exclusively), I include tweets that mention the hosts. Otherwise, I use the accounts and hashtags for the show.

For example, I use the following filter terms for MSNBC’s Morning Joe:

@Morning_Joe OR @morningmika OR @JoeNBC OR #morningjoe

This includes the accounts for Joe and Mika, since they are so closely associated with the show.  On the other hand, for MSNBC’s The Cycle I used:

#TheCycle OR @thecyclemsnbc

Because the show has four hosts with active Twitter lives of their own, I track the show by itself.  But since it’s interesting to see the aggregate counts including the host’s accounts, you’ll see a separate line item for counts including the hosts.  For The Cycle, then, the query that includes the hosts is:

#TheCycle OR @thecyclemsnbc OR @toure OR @krystalball OR @AriMelber OR @HuntsmanAbby

As you look through the ratings, you may see that the counts of mentions varies much more dramatically than the Nielsen ratings do; this is the influence of the shows themselves and how hard they try to engage on Twitter.

Twitter Shows Why Ed Schultz is Moving Back to Weekday Primetime

Im-with-edshow

Yesterday, MSNBC announced that they were moving Ed Schultz’s The Ed Show back from its weekend exile to the 5pm weekday slot.  The announcement took a lot of people by surprise, although the motivation for it has been known for a long time: the show that took Ed’s old 8pm M-F slot has been struggling in the ratings. MSNBC had made a classic media move — replacing an older anchor with a fresh face — but this time it didn’t work out as planned.

Fortunately for Ed, his fans moved with him to his weekend slots.  Almost immediately he was more popular on Twitter than the other MSNBC weekend shows.  That fan base is who’s carrying Ed back to primetime.

Continue reading

Does Walmart pay its employees better than left wing magazine “The Nation”?

An email landed in my email box today:

Walmart pays workers 80% more than its liberal critic

Oh, SNAP1! That sounds really bad.  Damn liberal hypocrites!  A click through to the underlying web site reveals this headline with more details:

Walmart still pays its average associate in N.Y. 80% more than The Nation will be paying its interns.

Hmmm, not quite as bad, but still bad sounding.

The web site goes on to quote an article in The Daily Beast entitled Walmart Calls Out The Nation for Its Low-Wage Internship Program.  That article comments on an email sent out by Walmart that chastises The Nation magazine for only now beginning to pay its interns minimum wage (instead of a previous $150 stipend).  The Daily Beast article goes on to state that Walmart employees average much higher wages (pointing out an average of $12.53 in Alabama) and get access to health benefits. So “The Nation” is a hypocritical left-wing double-standard holder who demands high wages from Walmart while paying the absolute minimum itself? Let’s look to the evidence presented to support their case.

Continue reading

20K #WhiteRage Tweets Prove Author’s Point with Unintentional Irony

2013-07-16 white rage salon

Edward Wyckoff Williams published an article today (7/15) on Salon.com entitled Our real problem is white rage — which has generated a lot of, well, rage. The article discusses the racial issues in the Zimmerman case and in the way people mistakenly anticipated rioting after the verdict’s announcement.

Amazingly, the anger at his article has become a major topic on Twitter. By the end of the day, reaction had snowballed to over 20,000 angry and mocking tweets.

The irony of that much rage denying rage is impressive. Very meta.

Continue reading

Watching the hackers try to break into Tomcat

I have a Tomcat server on the internet (www.socialresearchdesk.com) that runs a couple of applications of mine.  Tomcat, for those who aren’t aware of it, is a very lightweight, popular application server for deploying Java-based web applications.

It comes with a management application which has a set of standard (albeit disabled) accounts out of the box.  Naturally, I don’t use them — I have random bits of gibberish for both the user id and password for the manager account.

But every few days a hacker tries to break in; almost always the hacker’s IP address traces them back to China.  What’s amusing is the set of log in ids they think they can use to log in (here’s the most recent batch):

111111
123123
admin888
admin
admin!@#
tomcat!@#
manager!@#
tomcat5.0
tomcat6.5
tomcat6.0
tomcat7.0
s3cret
scret
ok
888888
1223
123
12345
123456
1234
1
112233
tomcat
password
passwords
manager
root
manager1
admin123
tomcat123
manager123
password
pass
P@ssw0rd
P@ssw0rds
tomcat
manager.
fuckhack
fuckhacker
qweasdzxc
qazwsxedc
fuckyou
linux
qwe!@#
!@#qwe
look
good
god
qweasd
zxcasd
jack
qwert
Internet
qwert12345
rootadmin
china
adminroot
5201314
anonymous
jsp
war
admin$

They don’t seem to try really hard, for what it’s worth — less than 3 minutes elapsed before they gave up.  Maybe I’ve been assigned to the summer interns?